Analysis of a Quote by Lyndon B. Johnson Essay Example for Free

Analysis of a Quote by Lyndon B. Johnson Essay â€Å"Better to have him inside the tent pissing out, than outside pissing in.† said by Lyndon B. Johnson. This quote doesn’t include lots of words, but it does demonstrate some valuable strategies. Before we get into it, there is a necessary story that I should mention below. In 1976, that was the first time that Reagan’s serious run for President. At that time, Gerald R. Ford was leading in the delegate count for the Republican nomination. Reagan realized that he could be lost unless he did something unique. Therefore, Reagan named Senator Richard S. Schweiker of Pennsylvania as his prospective running mate. Since Ford also was from Pennsylvania State, Reagan wanted to use this way to promote some Ford’s supporters change to support him. In order to destroy Reagan’s strategy, Ford reached Jim Baker to let him break Reagan’s attack, cost what it might. He launched a furious retail campaign to lure one delegate at a time back to Ford. Finally, Reagan have traded his number one chit, the vice presidency, for a total of four delegates. In the next president election, Baker acted as presidential campaign as manager for his old friend George Bush to against Reagan again. However, American voters were not interesting in George Bush this time, so that Reagan surpassed him. Also, Jim Baker was exchanged from loser’s campaign manager to winner’s top advisor somehow. Reagan followed an old rule that is â€Å"Keep your enemy in front of you.† It is a wise choice that Reagan did not chase Jim Baker who is his adversaries away instead he took hostages. In order to make Baker bring the largest functions to benefit Reagan, Reagan put his old adversaries into a position where Baker could not do well unless his president did well. Thus, Baker’s achievements had to enhance Reagan’s; he had no choice to make the Reagan Revolution a winner. Maybe Baker’s abilities and relationships are higher than Reagan’s, however, Reagan knew how to change his adversaries’ position and became one of his men. Never let enemies stand behind us, because they can harm us when they hid in the dark places. Therefore, we should learn from Reagan to keep enemies in front of us, and then they can be used to benefit us and defeat others. It is better to have enemies standing in our camp to attack others, than standing in other people’s camp to attack us.

Robert Jervis - Perception And Level Of Analysis :: essays research papers

Robert Jervis in Perception and Level of Analysis espouses the notion that in order to fully explain crucial decisions and policies it is essential that one pays heed to the decision-maker’s beliefs about the world and his or her perceptions of others. Rather than attempting to understand foreign policies as directly resulting from the three other levels of analysis, the bureaucratic, the domestic, and the international environment, which he outlines, Jervis contends that examination of a decision-maker’s perceptions, both their causes and effects, can more readily determine and explain behavioral patterns; in such a light, the taxonomy or three other levels of analysis appear devoid of truth value when applied alone, and all related theories are shown as invalid except in extreme cases. Nonetheless, one might more accurately contest that while careful study of a decision-maker’s beliefs is a necessity for comprehension, analysis of such beliefs is in fact an ex amination of bureaucratic organizations, domestic circumstances, and the international environment; all four are interrelated in the sense that the perceptions of the decision-maker are influenced by the circumstances existent in the three other levels. Likewise the three levels are themselves affected and often altered by the politician’s choices. Therefore, in order to provide the most comprehensive explanations of foreign policy decisions one cannot completely disregard externalities, and conversely one cannot ignore individual perceptions of decision-makers. One cannot rely solely on the bureaucratic level of analysis, the domestic, the international environment, or even on a combination of the three as adequate. What one might interpret as a clash of bureaucratic interests and stands yielding incoherent and conflicting policies, could in reality be a â€Å"clash among values that are widely held in both society and the decision-makers’ own minds† (Jervis 28). Similarly, if domestic situations were the medium upon which politicians base their decisions then changes in leadership would not necessarily produce significant changes in foreign policy; however, the consistency of foreign policy is difficult to measure. For example, some might contend that the Cold War would not have occurred had President Franklin Delano Roosevelt not died; they suggest that his death altered American policy in the sense that President Truman and his anti-Soviet position came to dominate political decision-making. Others contest that FDR would ha ve acted similarly to Truman, as he too was coming to an anti-Soviet stance prior to his death. If the former is seen as accurate the domestic level of analysis is insufficient and not applicable, but in the latter instance it could be viewed as a valid basis for judging decision-making.

Analysis of an Antacid

Analysis of an Antacid In this lab report we will discuss the results of the ‘Determining the Most Effective Antacids’ lab. In this lab we tested different brands of antacids to find out which will be the most effective at neutralizing acids. We will test this by seeing how much drops of hydrochloric acid (HCl) are required to neutralize a certain amount of the antacid. Antacids are used to resist heartburn. We sometimes use them to treat this because antacids are a mild base that can neutralize acids in our stomachs, such as HCl.The purpose of this lab is to see how well each antacid neutralize hydrochloric acid. Procedure: 1. Obtain two burets, one for use with the HCl and others for use with the NaOH. 2. Record the exact molarity as they appear on the stock bottles. 3. Determine the mass of each of you antacid tablets. 4. Dispense 25 mL of HCl solution into the Erlenmeyer flask, and then add one of the antacid tablets to the flask. 5. Bring the solution to a boil to d ispel any undissolved CO2. 6. Add two or three drops of an indicator to our antacid mixture. 7.Titrate antacid mixture with the NaOH solution until we have reached the end point of the indicator used. Mass tablet| VHCl| Vinitial NaOH| Vfinal NaOH| #moles HCl neutralized By antacid/ g tablet| x? – x| ( x? – x )2| 1. 29 g| 25 mL| 0 mL| 18 mL| 0. 0055961 mol/g| 0. 0024959| 6. 22952*10-6| 1. 221 g| 25 mL| 0 mL| 17 mL| 0. 0067452907 mol/g| 0. 00134671| 1. 8136*10-6| 1. 24 g| 25 mL| 0 mL| 18. 9 mL| 0. 005083629 mol/g| 0. 003| 9. 050296*10-6| 1. 273 g| 25 mL| 0 mL| 16. 2 mL| 0. 00714 mol/g| 9. 52*10-4| 9. 063*10-7| 1. 289 g| 25 mL| 0 mL| 15. 2 mL| 0. 0078 mol/g| 2. 2*10-4| 8. 5264*10-8| 1. 248 g| 25 mL| 0 mL| 10. 6 mL| 0. 01185 mol/g| -0. 003758| 1. 412*10-5| 1. 29 g| 25 mL| 0 mL| 9. 3 mL| 0. 01243 mol/g| -0. 00434| 1. 8818*10| Average x? = 0. 008092 mol/g ? (x? – x) 2 = 5. 102298*10-5 Standard Division = SD = Â ± ? x- x 2n-1 = Â ±0. 0029161 A brand name| Tums| Safew ay| Safeway| Phillips| Tums| Safeway| ActiveIngredient| CaCO3| CaCO3| CaCO3| Mg(OH)2| CaCO3| CaCO3| G active ingredient from battle| 0. 5 g| 0. 5 g| 0. 5 g| 0. 311 g| 0. 5 g| 0. 5 g| Calculated gActive ingredient| 0. 911 g| 0. 3718 g| 0. 3548 g| 0. 392 g| 0. 285 g| 0. 15 g| #moles HCl neutralized by active ingredient/g tablet| 0. 00587 mol| 0. 0060 mol/g| 0. 00709 mol/g| 0. 01345 mol/g| 0. 00648 mol/g| 0. 0081 mol/g| Cost / g| 4. 3835 ? /g| 7. 35 ? /g| 7. 50 ? /g| 17. 83 ? /g| 14. 011 ? /g| 5. 16 ? /g| Brand = Safeway regular strength Cost = $ 3. 99 #tablets = 150 g active ingredient = 500 mg each tablet Ingredient = (active) calcium carbonate, (inactive) corn starch, crospovidone, dextrose, flavor, magnesium stearate, maltodextrin, sucrose, talc. CaCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) > CaCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g) Calculation: 1.Calculate moles HCl neutralized by antacid per gram tablet: (Total moles HCl – moles HCl neutralized by NaOH) / mass of tablet Total moles HCl = Moles HCl neutral ized by NaOH = 2. Calculate grams active ingredient: 3. Calculate cost/gram: Based on the results, although Phillips brand was expensive, it was the most effective antacid. This is because it neutralized the most moles of HCl per gram of antacid. The active ingredient in this antacid is Magnesium Hydroxide. As the result, I prefer to buy Phillips antacid to resist heartburn. Chemical Equation: Mg (OH) 2 + HCl Cl (OH) 2 + MgH

Trump versus Hawaii - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 835 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/03/27 Category Politics Essay Level High school Tags: Donald Trump Essay Did you like this example? It was a situation when the US supreme court including presentational decree that was marked by President Donald Trump. He confined the movements in the United States by the general population from a few countries and asylums without legitimate travel reports. Hawaii and alternate expresses that had a similar test of the Proclamation. On the statutory and sacred grounds referred to the assortment of articulations by Trumps organization authorities. As should be obvious I picked the Trump Vs. Hawaii which occurred in April 25,2018. Chosen in June 26,2018. In September 2017, the President issued Proclamation No. 9645, trying to enhance screening methods for outside nationals going to the United States by distinguishing progressing lacks in the data expected to survey whether nationals of specific nations present a security risk. The Proclamation put section limitations on the nationals of eight remote expresses whose frameworks for overseeing and sharing data about their nationals the President esteemed insufficient. Outside states were chosen for consideration dependent on a survey attempted compliant with one of the Presidents prior Executive Orders. As a component of that survey, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), in discussion with the State Department and knowledge offices, built up a data and hazard appraisal baseline. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Trump versus Hawaii" essay for you Create order With the 50 day time span the State Department tried strategic endeavors to urge outside governments to enhance their practices, the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security inferred that eight nations; Chad, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen stayed lacking. She suggested passage limitations for specific nationals from those nations however Iraq, which had a nearby agreeable association with the U. S. She likewise suggested including Somalia, which met the data sharing part of the pattern norms yet had other extraordinary hazard factors, for example, a noteworthy psychological militant nearness. In the wake of counseling with various Cabinet individuals, the President received the proposals and issued the Proclamation. From these countries we will not have travel with either countries. March six executive over six Muslim majority and five are still on nations are constricted travel. This falls under the immigration laws and because the president is supposed to act quickly through national security. President also made this right after when he had the terries incident that had a constant threat, He confirmed that specific limitations were important to keep the section of those outside nationals about whom the United States Government needs adequate data and evoke enhanced character administration and data sharing conventions and practices from remote governments. The Proclamation forces a scope of passage confinements that fluctuate dependent on the particular conditions in every one of the eight nations. It exempts legitimate perpetual inhabitants and gives case-by-case waivers in specific situations. It likewise coordinates DHS to evaluate on a proceeding with premise whether the limitations ought to be adjusted or proceeded, and to answer to the President each 180 days. The court assumes the deciding between the plaintiffs statutory that the claims are reviewable and the statutory nonreliability. Secondly the president has lawfully exercised the broad discretion that grants him with the entry under the United States. Thirdly the plaintiffs did not demonstrate the lawlike of success on the merits of their own complaints. Hawaii best argument was basically saying its an old matter in a newer scenario trump was targeting the Muslim countries was intended through it. The outcome of the case wants to look at the constitution through the particular order. The arguments based upon the dissent is the people who disagree, who doesnt believe in the decisions Trump makes. They dont agree with the court orders with the immigration and nationality act. The people who would disagree with this law is the immigrants and the people who dont agree with the way he is doing it. The law breaks down to make the order. The main arguments upon this would have to be the people who travel maybe the process of what everyone has to go through is the challenging part of the whole law passed. Why take more time out of the day to this when everyone should be equal and set according to the point Trump is trying to make. I disagree completely because what if someone from a different area wanted to travel somewhere else? They cant because they dont have a travel document. Its not technically fare because not everyone can afford a passport, an id etc. Not everyone can afford paying for a travel document. To close today I went over the foundation of Trump versus Hawaii and how others cooperate framing the contentions by the dispute and how the historical backdrop of people in general has moved through every single case. This case was upset that I didnt concur with. I figure things ought to be contrastingly and that the constitution should re look this since migration is a tremendous issue in the US as per Trump. Race shouldnt have anything to do with what we recognize we have to figure out how to think of a superior method for how the constitution handles it.